Flaming Lips    Flaming Lips Message Board    Flaming Lips Message Board  Hop To Forum Categories  General Lips    R.T.E. Are a bunch of assholes.
Page 1 2 

Moderators: BAN-O-TRON, Drew, kliph, Natmo
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Satellite Heart
Picture of Emperor Clobbersaurus
Posted Hide Post
The review isn't very well-written, but the reviewer does bring to light an issue that I believe has merit...

quote:
Harry Guerin wrote:
...an art-rock misadventure that feels like a perverse desire by the band to confuse the people who fell for them from 'The Soft Bulletin' onwards.


I wholly disagree with it being a "misadventure," but his point about the album being reactionary is something I've had on my mind prior to its release.

Over the weekend I had a chance to listen to the entire album (bonus tracks and all) on a fine sound system. While sitting there being completely blown away, I emerged from my euphoria for a second and said something to the effect that don't you feel like this record is trying to prove something? To which my friend exclaimed something to the effect of yeah, it sounds like they are digging themselves out of a hole. Up until now every album in their library completely stands alone without it making the previous release obsolete, and this begs the question that is Embryonic a bold artistic statement or a bid for relevancy? A big "fuck-you" to the naysayers and critics (yes, I'm looking at myself) that we [the Lips] can still be weird, experimental, and provocative. I believe that it succeeds on both levels, but it's a shame that it feels as if they need to prove something. But as to it being "self-indulgent" and "unfocussed" is a load of horseshit. Embryonic is the most focused release they've done in some time. The purposeful usage of frenetic drumming, abrasive digitized noises, and a reluctance to be slavish to melody and traditional song structures provides a leitmotif to the record. It is thematic, complete, and not weird for weirdness' sake. It is polarizing and often difficult. There is a wonderful complexity to it, and it rewards the listener not only with repeated listenings, but with a focused listening. It is not aural wallpaper. It is a brilliant record. And the three bonus tracks or b-sides...holy fuck. There is your proof that the Lips can still write smart and effective pop songs.

I do not believe it is hyperbole when I state that years from now Steven Drozd will rightfully be considered a music visionary.
 
Posts: 65277 | Location: The sun and the moon? | Registered: August 31, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Watermelon Gunner
Picture of Hilbert Cheesecake
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Emperor Clobbersaurus:
The review isn't very well-written, but the reviewer does bring to light an issue that I believe has merit...

quote:
Harry Guerin wrote:
...an art-rock misadventure that feels like a perverse desire by the band to confuse the people who fell for them from 'The Soft Bulletin' onwards.


I wholly disagree with it being a "misadventure," but his point about the album being reactionary is something I've had on my mind prior to its release.

Over the weekend I had a chance to listen to the entire album (bonus tracks and all) on a fine sound system. While sitting there being completely blown away, I emerged from my euphoria for a second and said something to the effect that don't you feel like this record is trying to prove something? To which my friend exclaimed something to the effect of yeah, it sounds like they are digging themselves out of a hole. Up until now every album in their library completely stands alone without it making the previous release obsolete, and this begs the question that is Embryonic a bold artistic statement or a bid for relevancy? A big "fuck-you" to the naysayers and critics (yes, I'm looking at myself) that we [the Lips] can still be weird, experimental, and provocative. I believe that it succeeds on both levels, but it's a shame that it feels as if they need to prove something. But as to it being "self-indulgent" and "unfocussed" is a load of horseshit. Embryonic is the most focused release they've done in some time. The purposeful usage of frenetic drumming, abrasive digitized noises, and a reluctance to be slavish to melody and traditional song structures provides a leitmotif to the record. It is thematic, complete, and not weird for weirdness' sake. It is polarizing and often difficult. There is a wonderful complexity to it, and it rewards the listener not only with repeated listenings, but with a focused listening. It is not aural wallpaper. It is a brilliant record. And the three bonus tracks or b-sides...holy fuck. There is your proof that the Lips can still write smart and effective pop songs.

I do not believe it is hyperbole when I state that years from now Steven Drozd will rightfully be considered a music visionary.
Great post.
 
Posts: 2505 | Location: Change into a nine-year-old Hindu boy; get rid of your wife! | Registered: September 10, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Я2
Observer
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Emperor Clobbersaurus:
...a reluctance to be slavish to melody and traditional song structures provides a leitmotif to the record. It is thematic, complete...


I don't necessarily miss melody or more normal songs, I love all kinds of tracks that are nothing like normal songs. I think the Lips themselves have always worked with fairly normal song structures, so breaking out of that may take more than this album to be fully achieved. I think sonically the album is amazing, and there's where it actually makes a difference what kind of quality you hear the album in; should it really matter if the music itself is stronger than just what it sounds like? Would it be wrong to suggest it's just missing something? I remember, somehow, barbarella saying Mystics had no balls, and maybe for as good as it is, just maybe Embryonic is missing a bit of soul or something. Which is a fine thing to achieve if trying to evoke the inhumanity of machinery and metaphorical machinery (all-too rational conformity and mindlessness), but was it their aim to achieve that through the whole album? It does get livelier, more human, through the second half, but does it truly engage with your humanity?
 
Posts: 2 | Location: ho di ho, sir | Registered: October 26, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Telepathic Surgeon
Picture of windowlicker
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by windowlicker:
I kind of feel the same tbh. A lot of Embryonic sounds lazy, incompetent and uninspired to me.


I think I need to qualify this a bit. The Flaming Lips aren't incompetent, but I wish they didn't leave bum notes in.
 
Posts: 7226 | Location: The Natural Bridge | Registered: September 12, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Watermelon Gunner
Picture of Hilbert Cheesecake
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by windowlicker:
quote:
Originally posted by windowlicker:
I kind of feel the same tbh. A lot of Embryonic sounds lazy, incompetent and uninspired to me.


I think I need to qualify this a bit. The Flaming Lips aren't incompetent, but I wish they didn't leave bum notes in.
Wha? Isn't, say, In A Priest Driven Ambulance all the more brilliant for its off-key vocals and reckless guitar plucking?

I feel like some of the most common (and valid) complaints concerning Yoshimi and Mystics dealt with the overly sterile production aesthetic, which seemed to compromise spontaneity and raw expression ("bum notes and all") in favor of squeaky clean digitalization.

Embryonic veers violently in the opposite direction, and so they court the opposite criticism.
 
Posts: 2505 | Location: Change into a nine-year-old Hindu boy; get rid of your wife! | Registered: September 10, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Telepathic Surgeon
Picture of windowlicker
Posted Hide Post
I love In a Priest Driven Ambulance with every fibre of my being. From day one its "flaws" never mattered as the band seemed to have given their all in the making of it and the songs were mindblowing. I really don't think that's the case with Embryonic. Some of the bum notes on Embryonic are painful.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: windowlicker,
 
Posts: 7226 | Location: The Natural Bridge | Registered: September 12, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Telepathic Surgeon
Picture of windowlicker
Posted Hide Post
I feel like a cunt coming out and slagging it off.

Things I really like about it -

It flows really well.
Kliph's drumming is really fuckin good.
Drozd is still a genius.
"See the Leaves", "Convinced of the Hex", "Watching the Planets", "Sparrow..", "Silver Trembling Hands" and "Worm Mountain" are all good-to-great.
 
Posts: 7226 | Location: The Natural Bridge | Registered: September 12, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Satellite Heart
Picture of Emperor Clobbersaurus
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Я2:
I don't necessarily miss melody or more normal songs, I love all kinds of tracks that are nothing like normal songs. I think the Lips themselves have always worked with fairly normal song structures, so breaking out of that may take more than this album to be fully achieved. I think sonically the album is amazing, and there's where it actually makes a difference what kind of quality you hear the album in; should it really matter if the music itself is stronger than just what it sounds like? Would it be wrong to suggest it's just missing something? I remember, somehow, barbarella saying Mystics had no balls, and maybe for as good as it is, just maybe Embryonic is missing a bit of soul or something. Which is a fine thing to achieve if trying to evoke the inhumanity of machinery and metaphorical machinery (all-too rational conformity and mindlessness), but was it their aim to achieve that through the whole album? It does get livelier, more human, through the second half, but does it truly engage with your humanity?


I don't think it is wrong to suggest the record is missing soul if that's what Embryonic evokes in you. It's doing something right if it raises existential questions such as the ones you've posted.

I think the majority of people answering questions about the theme and overall concept about the album are misguided. Slowly, I am forming the belief that this release is purely an introspective insight into the band itself, or, at least the final half of it: the metaphorical death of The Flaming Lips and some type of new awakening or rebirth. Change. I'm trying real hard not to sound like a new age dipshit, but the themes, sounds, engineering, and songwriting (or lack thereof in some cases) all point to a massive shift in the band's collective aesthetics, and some would even say consciousness. I mean, it is quite apparent that the Lips have been purposefully ignoring, or, paying lip service to their past over this decade. This record is like the giant exclamation point just to nail it home. It is a mature and bold statement. We'll see how it plays out live. I could be totally full of shit, especially from viewing the secret show performance of "I Can Be A Frog." I mean, really, another romper room sing-a-long? Totally ruins the power of that song for me.

(I think I might have veered off subject a little)

This band is confusing and gives me headaches.

quote:
Originally posted by windowlicker:
I feel like a cunt coming out and slagging it off.


You shouldn't. I didn't consider you slagging it off it all. Well, maybe just a tad, but I understood what you were feeling. Possible just poor wording.
 
Posts: 65277 | Location: The sun and the moon? | Registered: August 31, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Satellite Heart
Picture of Emperor Clobbersaurus
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally spouted by Emperor Clobbersaurus:
I think the majority of people answering questions about the theme and overall concept about the album are misguided. Slowly, I am forming the belief that this release is purely an introspective insight into the band itself, or, at least the final half of it: the metaphorical death of The Flaming Lips and some type of new awakening or rebirth. Change. I'm trying real hard not to sound like a new age dipshit, but the themes, sounds, engineering, and songwriting (or lack thereof in some cases) all point to a massive shift in the band's collective aesthetics, and some would even say consciousness. I mean, it is quite apparent that the Lips have been purposefully ignoring, or, paying lip service to their past over this decade. This record is like the giant exclamation point just to nail it home. It is a mature and bold statement. We'll see how it plays out live. I could be totally full of shit, especially from viewing the secret show performance of "I Can Be A Frog." I mean, really, another romper room sing-a-long? Totally ruins the power of that song for me.


I'd like to retract the first sentence in the above post. No one is misguided in their interpretation of this release. You get out of it what you need to get out of it. There is no right or wrong answer. And I think the above interpretation is what provides me with the most comfort.
 
Posts: 65277 | Location: The sun and the moon? | Registered: August 31, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Telepathic Surgeon
Picture of windowlicker
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Emperor Clobbersaurus:

I didn't consider you slagging it off it all. Well, maybe just a tad, but I understood what you were feeling. Possible just poor wording.


Yeah..I'm struggling to express my feelings on this record. After reading Wayne's interview, I think I might be moving closer to appreciating the recording process and methodology behind it.

It would have been easy for them to knock off another Mystics, with Steven playing everything. He's probably fed up with having to come up with all the music.

I might not like the results, but the thought of Wayne standing there playing bass puts a smile on my face. I love that dude and knowing those bum notes are his kinda makes everything alright.
 
Posts: 7226 | Location: The Natural Bridge | Registered: September 12, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Big 'Ol Bug
Picture of birdmoore
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Posted October 27, 2009 03:51 AM Hide Post
quote:
Originally spouted by Emperor Clobbersaurus:
I think the majority of people answering questions about the theme and overall concept about the album are misguided. Slowly, I am forming the belief that this release is purely an introspective insight into the band itself, or, at least the final half of it: the metaphorical death of The Flaming Lips and some type of new awakening or rebirth. Change. I'm trying real hard not to sound like a new age dipshit, but the themes, sounds, engineering, and songwriting (or lack thereof in some cases) all point to a massive shift in the band's collective aesthetics, and some would even say consciousness. I mean, it is quite apparent that the Lips have been purposefully ignoring, or, paying lip service to their past over this decade. This record is like the giant exclamation point just to nail it home. It is a mature and bold statement. We'll see how it plays out live. I could be totally full of shit, especially from viewing the secret show performance of "I Can Be A Frog." I mean, really, another romper room sing-a-long? Totally ruins the power of that song for me.


I'd like to retract the first sentence in the above post. No one is misguided in their interpretation of this release. You get out of it what you need to get out of it. There is no right or wrong answer. And I think the above interpretation is what provides me with the most comfort.

I think I love you.
 
Posts: 794 | Location: Atlanta | Registered: March 24, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Satellite Heart
Picture of Emperor Clobbersaurus
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by birdmoore:

I think I love you.


Wayne's got brass balls like Keith Partridge
 
Posts: 65277 | Location: The sun and the moon? | Registered: August 31, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Five Stop Mother Superior
Posted Hide Post
I'm just smiling thinking of all the bum bass notes in "Jesus Shooting Heroin" and how much I love them.
 
Posts: 4889 | Location: the Heights of Chicago | Registered: December 26, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Telepathic Surgeon
Picture of windowlicker
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SlickPoetry:
I'm just smiling thinking of all the bum bass notes in "Jesus Shooting Heroin" and how much I love them.


It was kind of endearing back then, sure.

I thought the bass bum notes/slips on Embryonic were Michael's, and I was thinking "Mike, you've been playing bass for 25 years or more, c'mon." But they are more than likely Wayne's doing, which begs the question, has Michael developed a phobia about playing bass in the studio?

This message has been edited. Last edited by: windowlicker,
 
Posts: 7226 | Location: The Natural Bridge | Registered: September 12, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Five Stop Mother Superior
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by windowlicker:
quote:
Originally posted by SlickPoetry:
I'm just smiling thinking of all the bum bass notes in "Jesus Shooting Heroin" and how much I love them.


It was kind of endearing back then, sure.

I thought the bass bum notes/slips on Embryonic were Michael's, and I was thinking "Mike, you've been playing bass for 25 years or more, c'mon." But they are more than likely Wayne's doing, which begs the question, has Michael developed a phobia about playing bass in the studio?


Yeah, I don't know why Michael doesn't play more on this record. Just an odd thing, I guess. He does do a lot of production-stuff, I know...maybe Kliph can answer this
 
Posts: 4889 | Location: the Heights of Chicago | Registered: December 26, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Postman
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Reviewers should tell people what kind of stereo they use when reviewing albums/cds


Yes!!!!

Or more specifically they should state the format of the actual recording and the dynamic range of the speakers they are using(maybe even the volume). Most reviewers, I fear (having met quite a few over the years...music and noise journalists and even visual art critics) are not really technically educated and they don't realize that the aforementioned specs are not things that just subtly change the listening experience.

Something like the dynamic range of the speakers can totally change the experience especially with music/noise that is recorded with sources that span a wide range as is often the case with "non-mainstream" audio art.

But most reviewers I’ve met couldn't even tell you the dynamic range of their speakers and would happily admit to all sorts of varied listening conditions (different players, different file formats, sometimes in a car, sometimes outside, sometimes with headphones etc....) so its really pretty silly for me to complain i guess
 
Posts: 278 | Location: Just put your name at the bottom of this list and 759,347 people will send you a dollar! | Registered: November 03, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Hypnotist
Posted Hide Post
Well most of these reviewers/jerkoffs are paid by the word right. Maybe they listen to Reo Speedwagon to unwind (nothing wrong with that) but if I don't know the reviewer i don't bother reading. Record reviews are for people who don't know what they want and need to be told. Pack animals. The need reassurance. And they need the preprogramed responses society gives them (4/4 time signatures, perfect pitch, melodies they are already familiar with from major scales). Thats not this record. Stop complaining here and go back to the candlebox messageboard.
 
Posts: 32 | Registered: October 10, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Satellite Heart
Picture of Johnny Fever
Posted Hide Post
I really dig Embryonic, but it's gotten a lot more favorable reviews than I was excepting.
 
Posts: 30511 | Location: Smell my beard. | Registered: September 04, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2  
 

Flaming Lips    Flaming Lips Message Board    Flaming Lips Message Board  Hop To Forum Categories  General Lips    R.T.E. Are a bunch of assholes.

© Warner Bros. Records 2002